The short explanation
Ovarian PRP, platelet-rich plasma, is an experimental treatment. Small studies have reported results, but there is not yet good-quality evidence that it improves live birth rates for women with low ovarian reserve. It is generally not part of standard fertility guidelines. It is reasonable to ask the clinic what evidence they rely on, whether it is offered as part of a registered research study, and what your expected chances are with and without it.
What depends on your situation
The parts of this that change from woman to woman. Uncertainty is stated, not hidden.
- Women with low reserve can still conceive, naturally or with IVF, though success may be lower and more cycles may be needed. Donor eggs are another option some couples consider.
- High-cost add-ons can use up money that might be better spent on proven treatment. A second opinion, for example at a government medical college, can help.
- Ask for all costs in writing before deciding.
What this answer cannot determine
The boundary of online education. These need a clinician who can see you.
- This answer cannot tell whether any treatment will work for you. Your specialist should explain the evidence and your options.
Questions for your clinician
Take these with you. You can add any of them to an appointment card.
- What evidence is there that ovarian PRP increases live births?
- Is this offered as part of a research study?
- What are my chances with standard IVF?
- Could I get a second opinion before deciding?
When to seek help
Clinician-approved guidance for this topic. When in doubt, being seen is never the wrong choice.
Book an appointment soon
- See a doctor within a few days if you have pain or fever after any procedure.
Raise it at a routine appointment
- Book a routine consultation, and consider a second opinion before agreeing to costly add-ons.
Sources
The evidence this explanation is built on.
- Infertility NHS
- Infertility World Health Organization
- Infertility MedlinePlus (NIH)
Who wrote and reviewed this
Every AskHer answer names its author. A clinically reviewed answer also names the clinician who signed it off — if no clinician is named below, it has not been clinically reviewed.
- Author
- AskHer Editorial (AI-assisted draft) AskHer's editorial team — not an individual clinician Works in English, தமிழ், हिन्दी
- Clinical reviewer
- Nobody yet No clinician has signed this answer off, and no person on the editorial team has read it yet. That is what the “Written with AI assistance” label means. It is queued for an editor to read, and then for a clinician who works in this area. The sources it was drafted against are listed above.
- Review status
- Written with AI assistance — not yet reviewed by a person
- Last reviewed
- Not yet reviewed by a person
- Version
- 1
Correction history
Substantive changes are listed, not quietly edited away.
No corrections have been made since this answer was first published.
Did this answer your question?
Whatever you choose is filed against this version of the answer, never against you, and it is never shown as a count.
“Explain more simply” asks you which part was hard to follow, so the author knows what to rewrite. “My question is different” opens a private follow-up with this answer attached.
Saving, following up and reporting are all private. Nothing you do on this page is visible to other readers or to the doctor who wrote it, unless you ask a question.