Who decides, and what they have decided
note.md's governance commitment, made checkable: the people appointed to the clinical editorial council, the community advisory panel and independent appeal review, and a log of the decisions they have made.
Clinical editorial council
Clinical standards, publication disputes and safety-related corrections, with documented authority to reject sponsored content and require corrections — recruited from more than one organisation, so no single employer can decide what counts as correct.
No council has been appointed yet. AskHer's own governance page says so plainly — this list is read from the same record that page links to, so it is empty because nobody has been appointed, not because membership is kept off this page.
Decisions
General terms, never a name, a question or an identity beyond what a named member has already made public by serving. This is a decision log, not a case file.
Nothing is logged yet. Once the council exists and makes a decision, it appears here — this list is read from the record, so it is empty because there is nothing in it.
Community advisory panel
Participation experience, accessibility and language priorities.
Nobody appointed yet.
Independent appeal reviewer
Contested moderation decisions and conflict-of-interest cases, from outside the operating team.
Nobody appointed yet.